first of all, that's not always the case. My first hand experience: when I upgraded my Panasonic camera, the new one was a newer, higher, and more expensive model, but the video quality was much worse, to a point that I had to return it. And the low light shots suck!  Later I googled it and found out lots of people complain the same problem. That's when I switched to Sony.

That's ok. After the trip, then will use it for take pic for Tiff.  

FOr most of the time.

Second, I don't think it was simply because rx100 was a newer model, it was a different line of product, u r paying more for the better sensor.  I am sure if I compare that with the newer HX models, the overall quality is still better. But of course, u get what u pay for. RX100 and RX100 II are pricey, the question is whether u need it.   

Yeah. you are right also.  

ben, but if you want better picture quality, rx100 2 definitely offer much more; as for video, the HX lines were quite decent already.  

所以蛋嫂依家用手機影多, 貪方便喎

應該係話大部份人都係用手機就算，我有次拎個相機出嚟，啲人話: "wooooo.. a real camera!" 時代已經改變..

依家你用大機教多幾吓都比人話耐, 咁仲點有人平時 snap shoot 會用相影吖!!

而且... 依家好多手機都係標榜影相, 電話功能反而係副產品咁